ncomet1

Champion Author
Michigan
Posts:1,289 Points:408,780 Joined:Nov 2009
|
Message Posted: Jul 29, 2010 12:46:00 PM
Looks like they should have acted faster on replacing that section of pipe like they told regulators that they would do.
|
realtorguzzler

Champion Author
Florida
Posts:1,488 Points:259,210 Joined:Jun 2010
|
Message Posted: Jul 29, 2010 11:09:24 AM
Money is the problem. The more maintenance, the less profit.
|
chemist74

Champion Author
Cleveland
Posts:12,382 Points:2,178,090 Joined:Apr 2005
|
Message Posted: Jul 29, 2010 10:57:33 AM
Oil companies and pipeline companies should be held absolutely responsible for all damages from their operations so they will be "encouraged" to do preventive maintenance. The company apparently waited too long but at least they had already said they were considering replacing some of the line because of concerns before the leak.
|
PDQBlues

Champion Author
San Diego
Posts:4,716 Points:982,400 Joined:Jan 2009
|
Message Posted: Jul 29, 2010 10:29:46 AM
"why didn't someone do something about it???"
Because the industry demanded to be self-regulated and less governmental oversight, claiming the lie that they could do better when in fact they wanted to cut out safety measures for quick profits. When you buy a pack of lies, you get oil all over your face.
|
colrhino

Veteran Author
Atlanta
Posts:375 Points:117,395 Joined:Nov 2007
|
Message Posted: Jul 29, 2010 10:19:41 AM
then why didn't someone do something about it???
|